Legal Opinion

Duke v. L. Y. Stayton Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1924No. 18622. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Appellant, as liquidator of the insolvent Scandinavian-American Bank of Tacoma, instituted this action for the purpose of foreclosing an instrument, in form a quitclaim deed, as a mortgage, for the security of the payment of a note of $3,000 and interest, given the bank by L. Y. Stayton Company on October 17, 1919; and also for the security of sixteen promissory notes given the bank by Stayton individually, aggregating $29,552.87, and interest. The property described in the quitclaim deed was set forth in the complaint. It was prayed that the deed be decreed to be a first and prior mortgage…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blennerhassett v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Van Winkle & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Clayton v. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
  4. State Savings Bank v. BuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Curtis, Receiver v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API