Duke v. L. Y. Stayton Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Appellant, as liquidator of the insolvent Scandinavian-American Bank of Tacoma, instituted this action for the purpose of foreclosing an instrument, in form a quitclaim deed, as a mortgage, for the security of the payment of a note of $3,000 and interest, given the bank by L. Y. Stayton Company on October 17, 1919; and also for the security of sixteen promissory notes given the bank by Stayton individually, aggregating $29,552.87, and interest. The property described in the quitclaim deed was set forth in the complaint. It was prayed that the deed be decreed to be a first and prior mortgage…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blennerhassett v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Van Winkle & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Clayton v. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
- State Savings Bank v. BuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Curtis, Receiver v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938