Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deitrick v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 28, 1938No. 455Published

1DissentJustice Black

When two or more persons have jointly perpetrated a fraud with intent to injure others, justice and law combine to entitle injured parties to recover from any or all of the conspirators. Corporations can act only through agents. When, as here, two corporations, acting through authorized agents, have jointly perpetrated a fraud which was intended to—and did—injure others, a just rule of law should likewise hold both corporations jointly and severally responsible for the damages inflicted by them upon innocent parties.

In this case innocent depositors and other creditors of a now insolvent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Easton v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Case v. TerrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API