Adoma v. UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Class plaintiffs bring several wage and hour claims against defendants University of Phoenix, Inc., a for-profit university, and Apollo Group, Inc., its parent company. The parties bring cross-motions for partial summary judgment on the limited question of whether defendants were required to include the value of a tuition benefit when calculating an employee’s regular rate of pay for the purpose of paying overtime under California law. For the reasons described below, both motions are denied without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Def…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Flores v. City of San GabrielDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013