Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Beavers

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1996No. 03S01-9509-CV-00104PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

In this case we are faced with the issue of the continued viability of the zone of danger test as a limitation on liability when plaintiff is neither physically injured nor in an area where physical injury is possible. We conclude that in eases such as this, in which plaintiff sensorily observes the injury and resulting death of his mother, recovery should be allowed under circumstances in which the incident which produces the emotional injuries and the emotional injuries are reasonably foreseeable.

Mitchell Ramsey and his mother were traveling on Highway 58 in Hamilton…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Barnhill v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Camper v. MinorTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Heldreth v. MarrsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Jerry Garrison v. Rita BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jeremy Flax v. Daimler-Chrysler CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lourcey v. Estate of ScarlettTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Eskin v. BarteeTennessee Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API