Jeremy Flax v. Daimler-Chrysler Corporation
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, J.
in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, C.J., joined. CORNELIA A. CLARK, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. GARY R. WADE, J., concurring. WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
The plaintiffs filed this products liability case against DaimlerChrysler seeking damages for the wrongful death of their son and for emotional distress suffered by the mother. The plaintiffs also sought punitive damages. We granted review to determine: 1) whether a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim brought simultaneously with a wrongful death claim is a “stand-alone”…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited34 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by62 opinions
- Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Kristen Cox MORRISON v. Paul ALLEN Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Jerry Garrison v. Rita BickfordTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Joseph Davis v. Patrick J. McGuigan - DissentingTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.