Legal Opinion

Heldreth v. Marrs

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1992No. 21124PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Chief Justice:

The plaintiff, William Heldreth, appeals the order of the Circuit Court of Mercer County granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Anthony R. Marrs and Mary J. Clark, in a negligence action in which the plaintiff sought to recover, among other things, damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress. For reasons set forth herein, we conclude that the award of summary judgment should be reversed, and that this case should be remanded for further proceedings.

I

On January 9, 1987, Mr. and Mrs. Hel-dreth were shopping at the Hill’s Department Store in Mercer…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Travis v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Tanner v. Rite Aid of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API