Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Scott v. Dobson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1943PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The alternative writ alleges the official position of defendant Dobson; that the relator Eueidas K. Scott was and is the owner and holder of a judgment against defendant Platt, in the sum of $3,500, and interest thereon at the rate of 6 1/4 per cent per annum from January 1, 1932, and for $31.00 costs and disbursements duly entered in the circuit court of the state of Oregon for Multnomah county on the 8th day of January, 1942; that execution had been issued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riesland v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. KanzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Pierce v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Sam Savin, Inc. v. BurdsalOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Bethke v. BainOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Venn v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. STATE EX REL. DEWBERRY v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. STATE EX REL. PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH CO. v. DuncanOregon Supreme Court · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API