Legal Opinion

Smartflash LLC v. Apple Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 30, 2015No. 2015-1701, 2015-1707UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”), appeal from the district court’s order denying their motions to stay patent infringement litigation pending covered business method (“CBM”) review of the asserted claims. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mortgage Grader, Inc. v. First Choice Loan Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. BCG Partners, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Hilti, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  4. British Telecommunications plc v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
  5. British Telecommunications plc v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORPDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API