Legal Opinion

British Telecommunications plc v. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 27, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00366Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § Civil Action No. 18-366-WCB IAC/INTERACTIVECORP, MATCH § GROUP, INC., MATCH GROUP, LLC, and § VIMEO, INC., § § Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is a motion by defendants IAC/InterActiveCorp and Vimeo, Inc., (collectively, “the Vimeo defendants”) to stay the action in which plaintiff British Telecommunications PLC (“British Telecom”) has accused them of infringing claims 1 and 3–12 of

U.S. Patent No. 7,974,200

(“the ’200 patent”). Dkt. No. 125. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. In Re Berwyn E. EtterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API