Legal Opinion
Shutt v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 16, 1980No. 7569-1-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, J.—
Facts of Case
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint for damages against severed state revenue officers and public officials because it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under CR 12(b)(6). He appeals.
The plaintiff's amended complaint, attachments and admissions in his pleadings establish as follows: Mr. Shutt refused to file business and occupation tax returns for his hairstyling business as required by RCW 82.04.290; he also refused to pay the $368.65 tax assessed against him pursuant to RCW 82.32.100. When the State Department of Revenue,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bellevue Fire Fighters Local 1604 v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Terpstra v. Farmers and Merchants BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Whatcom County v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Layne v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- State v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.