Legal Opinion

Layne v. Hyde

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 1989No. 20919-1-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRevelle, J.

* -Thomas J. Layne and Francine B. Layne, individually and doing business as Downtown Mini Warehouse (hereinafter referred to as the Laynes), appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims and awarding attorney's fees and costs to the respondents.

The Laynes are the owners of Downtown Mini Warehouse. Dawn Marie LaBox (LaBox), formerly known as Donald Eugene LaBox, was employed by the business. After LaBox indicated a desire to be known as a woman, there was a series of incidents at work which culminated in termination of her employment.

In September of 1985, LaBox made a claim for benefits…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Eagle Point Condominium Owners Ass'n v. CoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Rhinehart v. Seattle Times, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API