Legal Opinion
State v. Neeley
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 20, 2002No. 20109-1-IIIPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
52 P.3d 539 (2002)
113 Wash.App. 100
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Phyla Jo NEELEY, Appellant.
No. 20109-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Two.
August 20, 2002.
Bevan J. Maxey, E. Armstrong Williams, Maxey Law Offices P.S., Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
BROWN, C.J.
After a failed suppression hearing challenging her arrest for possessing drug paraphernalia, which led to the discovery of cocaine, Phyla Jo Neeley was found guilty of possessing cocaine at a stipulated facts trial. We…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Tommy Owen HartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against ContehWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.