Legal Opinion

Eastman Nat. Bank v. Hertzler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 15027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, C.

The parties will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendants as they were designated in the trial court.

This action was brought by the Eastman National Bank, a corporation, against J. W. Hertzler, as maker, Newkirk Smelter Company, E. M. Clark, Wm. E. Willis, P. E. Chappell, and J. S. Hayes, as indorsers, to recover a balance claimed to be due said plaintiff upon a ■ promissory note executed by the defendant J W. Hertzler to the defendant Newkirk Smelter Company, and indorsed by said Smelter Company, E. M. Clark, Wm. E. Willis, P. E. Chappell, and J.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Tulsa St. Ry. Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Nix v. GilmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Crane v. FranklinArizona Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Morris v. McLendonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Atlas Life Ins. Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Branstetter v. Exchange Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API