Legal Opinion

AYALA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3371PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3371 In re Pablo AYALA-Arevalo, Respondent File A42 989 249 - Philadelphia Decided November 30, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) A discretionary waiver under section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (Supp. II 1996), is not available to an alien who has been convicted of an aggravated felony, or to an alien who has not lawfully resided continuously in the United States for the statutorily required period of 7 years, where the alien has previously been law- fully admitted…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. PhinpathyaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hing Sum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. KOLOAMATANGIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
  3. Karl Savoury v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Adaobi Stella Obioha v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. QUILANTANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API