Legal Opinion
QUILANTAN
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2010No. ID 3688PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 285
(BIA 2010) Interim Decision #3688 Matter of Graciela QUILANTAN, Respondent File A095 426 631 - Dallas, Texas Decided July 28, 2010 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals For purposes of establishing eligibility for adjustment of status under section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a) (2006), an alien seeking to show that he or she has been “admitted” to the United States pursuant to section 101(a)(13)(A) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(A) (2006), need only prove procedural…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lezama-Garcia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Cordova-Soto v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Gilfredo Lopez-Sorto v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- Tamayo-Tamayo v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.