Legal Opinion

Hajduk v. FAGUE

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1962No. Appeal, 276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This appeal involves an action in trespass in which the appellant sought damages from three defendants: Earl E. Pague, Auto Rental Company, and the Pennsylvania Railroad. The Pennsylvania Railroad named the City of Pittsburgh as an additional defendant. Appellant instituted proceedings to recover damages suffered by him on November 13, 1954, while he was riding as a guest passenger in a truck owned by the defendant ■ Auto Rental Company and leased to and operated by the defendant Fague, when the truck struck and collided with an overhead pass or trestle owned and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. James v. FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Brazel v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Skoda v. West Penn Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Migyanko v. ThistlethwaiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Cannon v. TaborSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API