Legal Opinion

Bamberger v. Terry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1881No. 150PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

103 U.S. 40

103 U.S. 40

26 L.Ed. 317

BAMBERGER

v.

TERRY.

October Term, 1880

ERROR to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.

The parties to this action having stipulated in writing that it should be tried by the court, the following facts were found by it to have been proven:——

On or about Aug. 12, 1875, the firm of S. A. Castle & Co., of the city of New York, consisting of Samuel A. Castle, Rufus E. Hitchcock, and Henry S. McGrane, being insolvent, made an assignment of all their goods and effects, for the joint and equal benefit of their creditors, under the statute…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Waite.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bamberger v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Bowden v. BurnhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  3. Cceur d'Alene Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  4. Bainum v. American Bridge Co. of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Shumacher v. St. Louis & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API