Legal Opinion

Bergey v. Foster

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1992No. 787 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Charles Brook Bergey appeals an order of the Insurance Commissioner affirming the denial of Bergey’s request for Catastrophic Loss Trust (CAT) Fund benefits by the Insurance Department’s Bureau of Consumer Services. We affirm.

The general question presented is whether a vehicle owner injured in an automobile accident is required to have had his vehicle registered under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1798, at the time of the accident in order to receive CAT Fund benefits.

The facts as found by the Insurance Commissioner are as follows.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MummaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. McDermond v. FosterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Employee Benefit Plan of Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. GrodeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shrom,T. v. PA Underground Storage Tank, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. Shrom,T. v. PA Underground Storage Tank, ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API