Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Terminal Co. v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1886PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Multnomah County. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This proceeding comes here on a writ of review issued out of the Circuit Court of Multnomah County, and directed to B. L. Norden, auditor and clerk of the City of Portland. The object of the writ is to review certain proceedings of the common council of said city, in attempting to appropriate some real property owned by the plaintiff in the city, for the purpose of extending North Third street through, the same.

*25The general power of the city to appropriate private property in said city for the purpose of a street extension is not disjiuted ; but it is insisted by the appellant that this can…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs R. R. v. Campbell, Nelson & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Wright v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1882
  3. State v. OfficerOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Dick v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Van Sant v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Towns v. Klamath CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Cauble v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Cauble v. HansonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Bewley v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API