Legal Opinion

Cauble v. Hanson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1923No. 379-3554PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

The Court of Civil Appeals favors us with a splendid statement of the nature and result of this case in the trial court as follows:

“Defendant in error, Hanson, sued G. C. Cau-ble, G. C. Cauble, Jr., and T. J. Clegg, plaintiffs in error, for $924, alleged balance due on a note given by the plaintiffs in error Cau-ble as rental for IS sections of land in Glass-cock county, leased by Hanson to them by written contract entered into between Hanson and the Caubles of date October 1, 1918.
“The defendants Cauble filed a general denial and special answer, to the effect that, although they had leased…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Forrest v. DurnellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cauble v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Moore v. KirganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Fabrique, Inc. v. Corman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. 718 Associates, Ltd. v. Sunwest N.O.P., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API