Legal Opinion
Cauble v. Hanson
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1923No. 379-3554PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The Court of Civil Appeals favors us with a splendid statement of the nature and result of this case in the trial court as follows:
“Defendant in error, Hanson, sued G. C. Cau-ble, G. C. Cauble, Jr., and T. J. Clegg, plaintiffs in error, for $924, alleged balance due on a note given by the plaintiffs in error Cau-ble as rental for IS sections of land in Glass-cock county, leased by Hanson to them by written contract entered into between Hanson and the Caubles of date October 1, 1918.
“The defendants Cauble filed a general denial and special answer, to the effect that, although they had leased…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davis v. VidalTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Forrest v. DurnellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cauble v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Moore v. KirganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Fabrique, Inc. v. Corman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- 718 Associates, Ltd. v. Sunwest N.O.P., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.