Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 27, 2015No. 14-0495/ARPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court.

Specialist (SPC) Matthew R. Adams Jr. was charged with numerous offenses, including robbery, in violation of Article 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 *138U.S.C. § 921 (2006). Consistent with his plea, Adams was acquitted of all charges but was found guilty of larceny, as a lesser included offense of robbery, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (2006). This Court granted review to determine whether the confession admitted by the military judge was properly corroborated.1 Finding insufficient corroboration for a number…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. MelvinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BishopUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  2. United States v. LatourNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  3. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  4. United States v. GableUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API