Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 1940No. 9468PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit by the patentee, Lester W. Bailey, for alleged infringement of his patent No. 1,907,473 for an indicating device designed to show “the exact angular position of the rotor blades” of a condenser, such as is used in a radio receiving set. The device is useful in tuning in stations whose dial readings are known. The device described in the patent consists of a dial with two hands, one moving ten times as rapidly as the other, although the patent is not confined to this ratio. The in- • dicator dial corresponds to the face of a watch and the two hands to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
- United States v. Kenneth Dale HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Slayter & Co. v. Stebbins-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Lane-Wells Co. v. M. O. Johnston Oil Field Service Corporation. M. O. Johnston Oil Field Service Corporation v. Lane-Wells CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Magarian v. Detroit Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.