Struthers v. Drexel
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES E0R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OE PENNSYLVANIA. Assumpsit. Yerdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant sued out tbis writ of error. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
This is an action of assumpsit brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error and Thomas S. Blair, the latter not having been served with process. The declaration contained two special counts, as follows:.
“For that whereas heretofore, to wit, on the 4th day of April, a.d. 1873,' at New Tort, to wit, in the Western District of Pennsylvania aforesaid, in consideration that the said plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the said defendants, would take and pay for, at the rate of $50.00 per share, four hundred (400) shares of the capital stock of the Blair Iron and…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Clune v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WeinrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924
- Buessel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Cuthill v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Blair v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.