Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. Courson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The effect of the decisions is to preserve the time-honored institution of the common law — the jury system. The right of both parties to a jury, free from bias, prejudice, or interest, should not be lost, and that right should not be subject to chance or perils such as have been pointed out and condemned by this court. See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Turner, 210 Ala. 197, 97 So. 687; City of Birmingham v. Lane, 210 Ala. 252, 97 So. 728; Leith v. State, 206 Ala. 439, 90 So. 687; Manning v. A. B. & A. Ry. Co., 206 Ala. 629, 91 So. 446; L. & N. R. Co. v. Turney, 183 Ala. 398, 62 So. 885; B. R.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. TurneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- City of Birmingham v. LaneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Morris v. Corona Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Jones v. ColeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.