Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Lane

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1923No. 6 Div. 821PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal is from the action of the trial court in granting a new trial on plaintiff’s motion.

If any proper ground of the motion, under the evidence before the court, will support the judgment in granting a new trial, the same will be sustained, and this is the rule, although the trial court may have based its action on an improper ground. Choate v. A. G. S. R. R. Co., 170 Ala. 590, 54 South. 507; Jones v. Jefferson County, 206 Ala. 13, 89 South. 174.

It will not be necessary to indulge in a discussion of the rules governing the granting or refusal of such motions. Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Batson v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Beasley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Shelby County v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Rose v. MagroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Clendenon v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API