Legal Opinion

Nakasone v. Nakasone

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2003No. 23460PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that matters in an offer of settlement made pursuant to Hawaii Family Court Rules (HFCR) Rule 68, which are initially rejected but later settled by agreement before trial, are not subject to an award of attorney’s fees and costs under Rule 68. We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals 1 (ICA) in Nakasone v. Nakasone, 102 Hawai'i 108, 73 P.3d 62 (App. 2002), which held to the contrary. 2

I

On November 24, 1998, Petitioner/Defen-danh-Appellant Gerald Nakasone (Petitioner) made a HFCR Rule 68 offer to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KealohaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Poe v. Hawai'i Labor Relations BoardHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Tax Appeal of Grace Business Development Corp. v. KamikawaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Langaman v. Mike Salta Pontiac, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Nakasone v. NakasoneHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owens v. OwensHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Cox v. Cox.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Malahoff v. SaitoHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API