Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Malahoff v. Saito

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2006No. 25180Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the first circuit court (the court) did not err in issuing a permanent injunction. However, I disagree with the majority’s analysis inasmuch as I believe that (1) Defendants-Appellants Russ K. Saito, in his capacity as Comptroller of the State of Hawai'i (the State) and Linda Lingle, in her capacity as Governor of the State [collectively, Defendants] are collaterally estopped from asserting that Plaintiffs-Appellees Alexander Malahoff, Linda Currivan, Diane Ferreira, Hugh Folk, Vincent Linares, David…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Miller Brewing Company v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API