Legal Opinion
State v. Wiederien
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 3, 2006No. 04-0815PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Justice.
The State charged the defendant with harassment under Iowa Code section 708.7(4) (2003). At the initial appearance, the court issued a no-contact order requiring the defendant not to have contact with the alleged victim. The district court acquitted the defendant of the charge but continued the no-contact order pursuant to section 708.12(2). Because we find the court does not have the authority to extend a no-contact order under section 708.12(2) after an acquittal, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for the court to issue judgment consistent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Auen v. Alcoholic Beverages Division of Iowa Department of CommerceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Christie v. Rolscreen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian NeiderbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. MusserSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Casey Mcgill Ginger L. Mcgill Ashlea D. Mcgill And Casey Mcgill, As Parent And Next Best Friend Of Amanda R. Mcgill, Alicia C. Mcgill, And Allison C. Mcgill, Minors Vs. Ben Fish, Thomas Vine, Mark Newton, Robert Selby, And Steven ShafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State of Iowa v. Jonathan Q. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State of Iowa v. Carson Michael WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.