Legal Opinion

People v. Friesen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 2001No. 00CA2220PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PLANK.

Defendant, Randall W. Friesen, appeals the trial court order denying his Crim. P. 85 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

Defendant entered guilty pleas to two counts of theft, a class four felony under § 18-4-401, C.R.S8.2001. Pursuant to the plea agreement, he was sentenced to two seven-year terms in the Department of Corrections (DOC), to be served concurrently.

Thereafter, defendant filed a Crim. P. 85(c) motion, alleging that he had not been advised of the mandatory parole term that attached to his sentences and asserting that the addition of mandatory parole…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. OliverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. People v. BlackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. People v. NguyenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. People v. StreanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. OglethorpeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. LovatoColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People v. DeanColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API