Anonymous v. Attorney Grievance Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
In this case, we are asked to decide whether the Attorney Grievance Commission was authorized to investigate the plaintiffs client trust accounts and, if so, whether the commission was authorized to conduct that investigation by issuing a subpoena duces tecum to the plaintiff prior to the issuance of a formal complaint by the Attorney Discipline Board. We answer both of these questions in the affirmative, and therefore deny respondent’s request for superintending control.
i
The plaintiff in this matter is an attorney at law. On September 20, 1985, a request for an investigation of the plaintiff…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Matter of HagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Production Credit Ass'n v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 165761_52_01.PdfMichigan Supreme Court · 2024
- Anonymous v. Attorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- In re Unnamed AttorneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991