Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Lightfoot

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1920No. Civ. No. 3373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sa.n Bernardino- County. H. T. Dewhirst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment in a suit - for partnership accounting. The judgment provided that the assets of the partnership be sold by a commissioner, and upon the return of the commissioner and the equal division of the assets between the parties, a final judgment be entered dissolving the partnership or declaring it dissolved.

[1] The respondent contends that the judgment is a nonappealable interlocutory order. The findings and conclusions of law finally determined the rights of the parties, leaving only the transmutation of the assets into cash and their equal division to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. DunnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. In Re Estate of WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Andrade v. Superior Court of CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People Ex Rel. Bank Commissioners v. Bank of Mendocino CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Byrne v. HoagCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nevada Constructors, Inc. v. Mariposa Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Caminetti v. Imperial Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Price v. SlawterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. O'HARA v. LanceArizona Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API