Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Bowling

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1956No. 670PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

In connection with the assignments of error based upon the exceptions taken and presented on this appeal, it must be borne in mind that an estate by the entirety in personal property is not recognized in North Carolina. Turlington v. Lucas, 186 N.C. 283, 119 S.E. 366; Davis v. Bass, 188 N.C. 200, 124 S.E. 566; Smith v. Smith, 190 N.C. 764, 130 S.E. 614; Winchester-Simmons v. Cutler, 194 N.C. 698, 140 S.E. 622; Dozier v. Leary, 196 N.C. 12, 144 S.E. 368; Wilson v. Ervin, 227 N.C. 396, 42 S.E. 2d 468.

And, under the laws of this jurisdiction, nothing else appearing, money in bank to the j oint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Turlington v. LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Taylor v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Wilson v. . ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Turlington v. . LucasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Rowan Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Leatherman v. LeathermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Shores v. RabonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. In Re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Recorded in Book 911, at Page 512Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API