Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adams v. George

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1991No. 18298Published

1DissentMcDEVITT, Justice

I cannot agree with the majority’s holding that George did not assume the existing mortgages. There are three main factors leading me to conclude that George assumed the underlying mortgages.

*978First, George purchased the property for $45,000.00 The two existing mortgages totaled $41,000.32. After deducting the mortgage balance from the purchase price and then making deductions for transactional costs, George paid the sellers $2,054.30 in cash. The deduction of the mortgage balance from the purchase price in and of itself is proof that the buyer assumed the mortgage. Hinckley Estate Co. v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gardner v. FliegelIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. International Engineering Co. v. Daum Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Klundt v. CarothersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jolley v. ClayIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Siekman v. MolerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API