Adams v. George
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentMcDEVITT, Justice
I cannot agree with the majority’s holding that George did not assume the existing mortgages. There are three main factors leading me to conclude that George assumed the underlying mortgages.
*978First, George purchased the property for $45,000.00 The two existing mortgages totaled $41,000.32. After deducting the mortgage balance from the purchase price and then making deductions for transactional costs, George paid the sellers $2,054.30 in cash. The deduction of the mortgage balance from the purchase price in and of itself is proof that the buyer assumed the mortgage. Hinckley Estate Co. v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gardner v. FliegelIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- International Engineering Co. v. Daum Industries, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Klundt v. CarothersIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Jolley v. ClayIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Siekman v. MolerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.