Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Riley

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1942No. Civ. No. 6832PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The executors of the last will of Charles Pala, deceased, have appealed from a purported order of the Probate Court of Del Norte County holding that Crescent Lodge No. 45, Free and Accepted Masons, a fraternal organization, as a residuary legatee of the estate of said deceased, is subject to the payment of collateral inheritance tax.

The respondent contends that no findings, judgment or order was made, rendered or entered with relation, to said proceeding, and that the purported appeal is therefore premature and void; that the court merely filed its “Memorandum of Opinion” therein, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Waidley v. DoddsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Cavagnaro v. DelmasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Young v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirkwood v. RowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Rosland v. ConstantineauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Estate of McAfeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Sherman v. IngelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Bradford v. Southern California Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API