Chambers v. Walker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Justice.
This appeal presents only one issue: whether an uninsured motorist coverage provision allowing a reduction or set-off of amounts paid or payable under any workmen’s compensation law is void as being in derogation of the legislative purpose contained in the Uninsured Motorist Statute.
The undisputed facts are that a traffic accident occurred involving Tony Ray Chambers [hereinafter referred to as appellant] and the defendant, Henry Winfield Walker. As a result of the collision, appellant suffered a broken neck rendering him totally disabled and without use of his arms or legs.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Selected Risks Insurance Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WendtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Barfield v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Bohannan v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.