Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Chapman v. Truder

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1930No. 3579PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT'

BICKLEY, C. J.

This was an action brought by the appellee, against appellant, the district attorney of the Fourth judicial district, for unlawfully intruding into the office of mayor of the city of Las Vegas. His position is that when appellant, the mayor of the city of Las Vegas, became the elected, qualified and acting district attorney' aforesaid, the office ’ of mayor became vacant by virtue of subsection 8 of section 96 — 107, 1929 Comp., providing that an office of the class here involved becomes vacant by the incumbent “accepting and undertaking to discharge the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Murphy v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. People ex rel. Attorney General v. ProvinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Peterson v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  4. Holley v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Mowrer v. RuskNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Estate of Romero Ex Rel. Romero v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Aguilar v. City CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API