Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Bankers Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 8, 1997No. C-96-0917 EFLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LYNCH, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, the Court must decide whether loss of inventory not submerged under water but damaged by flood water is a covered loss under a Standard Flood Insurance Policy (“SFIP”) issued pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 4001-4128. Simply put, the Court’s answer is yes.

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Bob and Mary Stevens own and operate a decorating supply store in Napa, a town about 50 miles north of San Francisco in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. State Farm Fire & CasualtyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
  2. Mason v. WittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999
  3. Bianchi v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
  4. Hampton v. First Protective InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API