Legal Opinion
Mason v. Witt
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 4, 1999No. CV-F-99-5127-LJOPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (U & 26)
O’NEILL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to a notice filed on July 21, 1999, Defendants James Witt and Jo Ann Howard (collectively “the Federal Defendants”) seek an order dismissing the third amended complaint. Pursuant to a notice filed on July 22, 1999, Defendant Bankers Insurance Company (“Bankers”) also seeks an order dismissing the third amended complaint. Plaintiff Paul W. Mason (“Plaintiff’), who is proceeding pro se in this action, has not filed an opposition to either motion. 1 Pursuant to Local Rule…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Scherz v. South Carolina InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Davis v. Travelers Property & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
- Neill v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.