Fitzmaurice v. Van Vlaanderen MacHine Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This matter involves an alleged breach of contract for professional services. The plaintiff, Richard J.' Eitzmaurice, a business consultant specializing in marketing and sales, entered into an employment contract with the defendant, Van Vlaanderen Machine Company (hereafter defendant), a manufacturer of printing presses, to provide business diagnosis and interim management for one year at $52,000. The terms of the contract which were embodied in a letter from plaintiff to defendant contained the following provision:
* * * I have agreed to release you from this contract three months from this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lockwood Manufacturing Co. v. Mason Regulator Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- American Music Stores v. KusselCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Hummel v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Patterson v. Alabama Vermiculite Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957
- Meyers v. PotokerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- AMERICAN ASSOC. UNIV. PROF v. Bloomfield CollegeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Pace v. HymasIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.