Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bailey v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1991No. 90-1015PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to determine whether a farm using power-driven machinery qualifies as a workshop, factory or construction industry under Ohio Adm.Code Chapters 4121:1-3 and 4121:1-5. We find sua sponte, however, that appellant’s failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies precludes us from reaching this question.

Under Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-20(G), a party may seek rehearing of a VSSR decision within thirty days of the order’s receipt. The present record contains no evidence of a rehearing request, indicating instead that appellant filed his mandamus petition just fifteen days after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Schindel v. RoweOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palmer Bros. Concrete v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, 13-07-16 (2-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Koch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. O'Brien & Assocs., Co. L.P.A. v. TyackOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Bailey v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Koch v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API