Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schindel v. Rowe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1971No. 70-349PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator contends that his application for a permit was denied by respondent for the reason that the Kettering ordinance, supra, zoned his property “residential” without notice and that by virtue of such legislative action he was prohibited from taking an effective administrative appeal.

Relator made no application for a variance before filing this action. Because he did not exhaust the administrative remedies available to him, mandamus is not available.

R. C. 519.18 provides that upon annexation of township territory to an existing municipal corporation, the zoning regulations then in effect…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kaufman v. Village of Newburgh HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State ex rel. Reeves v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Dynamic Industries, Inc. v. Cincinnati (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Bailey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API