Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Koch v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1992No. 91-15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Our review of the record indicates that claimant did not seek administrative rehearing of the commission’s order as permitted by Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-20(G). As a general rule, failure to exhaust available administrative remedies precludes issuance of a writ of mandamus in a VSSR action. State, ex rel. Bailey, v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 191, 580 N.E.2d, 1081. Cf. State, ex rel. Cotterman, v. St. Marys Foundry (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 42, 544 N.E.2d 887.

For this reason, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cotterman v. St. Marys FoundryOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Bailey v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Koch v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API