Legal Opinion

Wood v. Brown

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1916No. 20,278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Bourbon district court; Charles E. Hulétt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to enjoin the defendant from collecting water by means of a tile drainage system on his farm and discharging it upon the plaintiff’s farm through a six-inch pipe and a ditch. The plaintiff recovered and the defendant appeals.

The six-inch pipe was laid in a ditch through what is called a ■hogback near the line dividing the two farms. The pipe ends on the defendant’s farm nineteen feet from the line. It empties into a dug ditch leading to a depression on the plaintiff’s land through which water naturally finds its way to Lath…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. HerringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Lambert v. AlcornIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gibbs v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Rait v. FurrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dyer v. StahlhutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Evans v. DiehlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Frank v. Kansas Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. Tompkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API