Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Stahlhut

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1938No. 33,838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

It was sought in this action to obtain a mandatory injunction for the removal of an alleged obstruction to the drainage of surface water on agricultural land outside the limits of an incorporated city. John Heitman was merely joined as a party defendant by reason of the fact he was the tenant of the principal defendant. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

It is contended the findings of fact made by the trial court do not support the judgment. The findings read:

“1. The plaintiff is and has been since the year 1932, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Martin v. LownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Horton v. SullivanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Gentry v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clawson v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  2. Goering v. SchragSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Bolinger v. MoorhouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API