BE MI, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
St. Clements Homeowners Association (the Homeowners Association) appeals the administrative law court’s (ALC) decision that Be Mi, Inc. met the requirements for a restaurant liquor by the drink license. It contends Be Mi does not meet the seating requirements because some of the seats counted are in common areas and other seats are bar stools at a rail. It also asserts Be Mi does not have control over the deck, where many of its seats are located, and does not have a lease for the deck space. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1988, Be Mi purchased a snack and pool bar, known as St. Clements Beach Bar &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Anonymous v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Epstein v. Coastal Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Reliance Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jack's Custom Cycles v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- Jack's Custom Cycles v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- McEntire Produce v. SCDORCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023
- Trident Medical v. SCDHEC (Medical University)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022