Legal Opinion
McLane v. Haydon
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 21, 1914No. 695PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Error from Hale County Court; W. B. Lewis, Judge. Action by J. S. Haydon and others against John B. McLane. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. On motion to strike statement of facts.
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Strike Statement of Facts.
HENDRICKS, J.
[1,2] The defendants in error move to strike the statement of facts from the record, upon the ground, among others:
“Because the same was not filed in the court below within the time provided by law, * * * and it appears from the certificate of approval that the county judge approving the same did so without authority of law.”
The cause was tried at the March term of the county court, which court adjourned on the 21st day of March, 1914. There appears no order in the record extending the time for filing the statement of facts. The record…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Unknown Heirs of Criswell v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Louisiana-Rio Grande Canal Co. v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. West Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brillhart v. BeeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Winnsboro Cotton Oil Co. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Garrard v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Nemir v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Green v. GernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.