Legal Opinion

Louisiana-Rio Grande Canal Co. v. Quinn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1913PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

The judgment against plaintiff in error was rendered on February 16, 1912, and notice of appeal was given. A supersedeas bond was given by plaintiff in error, which purports to have been filed on March 6, 1912. Nothing further was then done in connection with the matter until January 18, 1913, when plaintiff in error presented bills of exception and a statement of facts, which the county judge ordered the clerk to file as of date April 1, 1912. The statement of facts purports to have been approved April 2, 1912, although such date is not the true one. There is no pretense that the bills of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. ClanceyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Welch v. WeissTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Unknown Heirs of Criswell v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Thompson v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Welsh v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brillhart v. BeeverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. City of Aransas Pass v. Eureka Fire Hose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. McLane v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Camp v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Tyler v. SowdersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API