Legal Opinion

Peacock v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Titus. Tried below before the Hon. James H. Rogers.

1Opinion of the Court

Reeves, Associate Justice.

Appellants assign for error the ruling of the District Court in rendering a final judgment against them as sureties for M. M. Miller on a forfeited bail bond.

It appears that Miller, who was indicted for an assault, executed the bond in question, with Turner and Peacock as his sureties. The bond bears date September 27, 1871, and required Miller to appear before the District Court of Titus county on the second Monday in October, 1871, to answer the charge against him. Miller having failed to appear at the March term, 1873, of the District Court, a judgment nisi was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gay v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. West v. ColquittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Moreland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  5. Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API