Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1888No. 5612PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lamar. Tried below before the Hon. D. H. Scott. The opinion states the case. The amount of the bond was five hundred dollars. The amount adjudged against the appellants was fifty dollars.

1Opinion of the Court

Hurt, Judge.

Lee was indicted for forgery, and Schmidt and Parrott were sureties on his recognizance, the amount of which was five hundred dollars. Judgment ni si was taken on October 22, 1886. On October 25 Lee surrendered himself to the sheriff, was placed in jail, and in November, 1886, was tried and convicted.

Schmidt and Parrott answered the scire facias, first, the surrender and conviction of their principal. The surrender to the sheriff, being after the judgment ni si, presents no reason why the judgment ni si should not be made final. If before the judgment ni si the principal be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  2. State v. AkeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Peacock v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Sureties of KrohneWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Dilley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API