Auz v. Cisneros
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice
The only issue sufficiently briefed in this appeal is whether the summary-judgment evidence conclusively proved that the attorney’s fees sought by the plaintiff are reasonable and necessary. Concluding that, under recent precedent from the Supreme Court of Texas, the summary-judgment evidence did not conclusively prove reasonable and necessary fees, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings.
I. Factual and ProceduRal Background
Appellee/plaintiff Mario Cisneros filed suit against appellant/defendant Felix A. Auz asserting a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- El Apple I, Ltd. v. OlivasTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Lubbock County v. Trammel's Bail BondsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- San Saba Energy, L.P. v. Crawford, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Long v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- City of Laredo v. MontanoTexas Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Universal MRI and Diagnostics Inc. v. Medical Lien Management Inc. D/B/A BridgewellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Texas Black Iron, Inc. v. Arawak Energy International Ltd, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Hong v. HaveyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Godoy v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- R2 Restaurants, Inc. v. Mineola Community Bank, SSB, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.